Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Knightsbridge Dolls Collection

mulierium


So, this post is kind of encyclical.
will be long and painful.
the Financial Times said that Italy is the land of naked women. That we are a country that has the top of the pyramid of his fictional pigs and whores. Benissimo. Grazie cari amici inglesi. Acuti come voi nella analisi ce ne sono pochi: siete geniali.
Punto primo: avete scoperto l’acqua calda! Sono almeno dieci anni che è così e voi vi svegliate solo oggi.
Punto secondo, noi cretini italiani, li stiamo pure ad ascoltare: e diciamo “è vero! Accidenti è vero!”.
Ma certo che è vero! Lo sanno anche le veline, che notoriamente hanno il cervello intorpidito in maniera quasi irreversibile: lo sanno anche loro che l’immaginario italiano ruota attorno ai porci e alla puttane.
Il fatto che sia vero e che lo sanno tutti non risolve il problema.
Ammesso che sia un problema.
Ma la cosa che invece più mi lascia sbalordito is that women complain about it. And their cry constantly being surrounded by people who calculate only the physical aspect, forcing them to strip and prostitute themselves in long, silent television appearances that demean the very high intellectual capacity and harm the endless years of study: bullshit!
And then down to blame men, the male-dominated society, to those porcacci forcing them to worse things, even earning a miliardino just to say "go to tim!. Poor fellow!

So the news in newspapers was not that Italy is a land of swine and whores , no. The news is: Italy is a country of macho pigs . And on the sociologist Chiara Saraceno tells us we are back from the rest of Europe, the Rodotà tells us that women have fallen into the trap (fortunately dangles here and there some responsibility from women, but not much) but without specifying that if the trappolone have done alone.
As long as we talk about work, right to maternity leave for men, periods of paternity leave, I'm there: they agree more, except that the woman and man are very different relationship with the child: this does not change under any law, reform or riformona for now.
But the fact is another and is social, of the imagery, the ideal (if we are out of line): The fact is that the worst enemies of women are women themselves than men.
E 'useless to complain that the women, saying "we put off because it is the only way to win the attention of men." It would be like saying that the responsibility of the experiment on Pavlov's dog is the dog! Because we know we men are dogs, but woe to tell them they are bitches (Pavlov)!
E 'useless that women re-complain, saying, "but it is men that make us so, that design these advertising campaigns, offering this model! They are the men who rule. " And in this case, in fact, the dogs (Pavlov) they would be. But no one forces them to do so. I do not think that the hordes of candidates to be driven by tissue conscription.
is they who are against themselves. Could form a common front and we put boys on the ground at any time - and were also to do that - instead of continually abdicate their role as women, preferring to carefree cocotte.
I wonder: is there really need the shares rose? Of course there is need, but expected from men is ludicrous: if I want a freedom I take it. Do not expect me to grant, that freedom would be otherwise? A grace received! And I hate the graces received, I know you ladies! Of course we men should
empowered and feel indebted to women, but certainly we do not feel indebted to or aware of the tissue (and the like). We treat them like Kleenex because they are made to be treated as Kleenex, we should treat them otherwise?
There is another way to treat the girl the disco veneer of lacquer and Swarovski that strikes once every fifteen minutes as the bell tower of the cathedral? Tell me!
Women, this time the blame is yours. There is no saint. (End Part)

0 comments:

Post a Comment